Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02889
Original file (BC 2014 02889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02889

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam 
(administratively resolved), Thailand, Okinawa, and Europe.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During that period of time many service members were stationed at 
bases where it was not documented they had boots on ground.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 16 Jul 68, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force.

The applicant’s Airman Performance Report (APR) rendered for the 
period 1 Aug 69 through 31 Jan 70 reflects his squadron was on 
temporary duty (TDY) to RAF Mildenhall, England.

On 2 Aug 72, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, 
and was credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 20 days of active 
service.

On 16 Feb 11, SAF/LL notified the applicant’s Congressional 
representative that his temporary duty (TDY) assignments to 
Vietnam had been verified and that his entitlement to the Vietnam 
Service Medal with two bronze service stars (VSM w/2BSS) had also 
been confirmed and that his records were corrected 
administratively.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice.  While the applicant’s foreign service in 
Vietnam and Taiwan were confirmed, there was no evidence contained 
in his records or his submission indicating he served in Thailand, 
Okinawa, or Europe.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 11 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting beyond that rendered 
administratively.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-02889 in Executive Session on 21 Apr 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-02889 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Jul 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 20 Nov 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02256

    Original file (BC 2014 02256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice to award the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM). There is no official documentation within the applicant's official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces for award of the VCM. Upon final board decision, the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 04176 2

    Original file (BC 2010 04176 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the original case, the applicant contended he served on temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam and Okinawa, Japan, and submitted a sworn statement from an alleged eyewitness who served with him in Vietnam in support of his request. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. On 20 Feb 14, AFPC/DPAPP directed the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect 4 months and 13 days of foreign-service credit for his service in Germany during the period 3 Oct 63 through 15 Feb 64. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00621

    Original file (BC-2012-00621.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with 3 years, 8 months, and 27 days of active duty service. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part that a review of his Master Personnel Records (MPRs) and documentation submitted failed to reveal any documents that substantiate foreign service time in Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02609

    Original file (BC-2012-02609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect his service time in Vietnam or Thailand. Although he has been unable to provide copies of the travel vouchers for these TDYs, in view of the fact the foreign service documented on his DD Form 214 exceeds his tour length in Taiwan, as confirmed by the OPR, by 3 months and 21 days, we find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.